June 11, 2004
By MARC PERELMAN
Listening to officials at the Jewish Agency
for Israel tell it, the quasi-governmental Israeli
social-service organization staged a made-for-movie rescue
last week of a Jewish family being held captive by religious
fanatics. But instead of whisking endangered refugees from
impoverished or repressive states in Africa, the Arab world or
the former Soviet Union, the agency's mission this time was to
save Yemenite Jews living in a chasidic community in Monroe,
N.Y., just 55 miles north of New York City.
Agency officials announced last week that they
had secretly organized the emigration to Israel of Naama
Nahari and five of her 12 children, suggesting that the family
had been held against its will, along with several dozen other
Yemenite families, by the Satmar chasidic community of Monroe.
Satmar representatives strenuously deny the
allegation.
Michael Landsberg, the agency official who
oversaw the June 1 operation, said it was a "sad situation"
and claimed the Satmar chasidim were engaged in "unlawful
practices," which he refused to describe. In arranging for the
departure of the Naharis, Landsberg said, he was merely
fulfilling his duty to "assist my people in the most efficient
way."
Most Jewish organizations and relevant U.S.
law enforcement authorities have declined to take a public
stance on the issue.
An official with a mainstream Jewish
organization who is familiar with the case said the situation
was "murky" and that no documented evidence existed to prove
that the Yemenites were being held against their will, thus
precluding further communal or legal action.
The Nahari family came to the United States
eight years ago from their native Yemen, after the regime
allowed the country's remaining Jews to emigrate. According to
news reports at the time, the emigration had been arranged in
contacts between the regime and representatives of the Satmar
community, which is ideologically opposed to Jewish statehood
before the arrival of the Messiah and reportedly promised the
militant regime that the émigrés would not find their way to
Israel.
However, after protests from the Jewish
Agency, a compromise was hatched according to which the
Yemenite Jews would resettle in Israel on the condition that
they would not be scattered around the country. The Yemenites
would also be allowed to attend yeshivas, according to an
official involved in the talks. But several families
nevertheless came to the United States, causing lingering
resentment at the Jewish Agency, the official
added.
The Satmar community is the largest chasidic
community in America. Based mainly in the Williamsburg section
of Brooklyn, it has a satellite community of some 15,000 in
Kiryas Joel, an all-chasidic incorporated village in Monroe
Township named for Satmar's founder, Rabbi Joel
Teitelbaum.
Jewish Agency spokesmen and leaders of the
Yemenite Jewish Federation of America, an immigrant group
funded by UJA-Federation of New York, charge that Yemenite
immigrants are kept in Kiryas Joel and nearby communities by
Satmar leaders without knowledge of their rights, have had
their passports taken away and have been threatened with
punishment if they attempted to leave.
Satmar representatives denied that their
community was preventing Nahari or any other Yemenite Jews
from leaving.
Calls seeking comment were not returned from
the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society or from United Jewish
Communities, which funnels more than $200 million raised each
year by local charitable federations to the Jewish Agency. The
Monroe police also failed to return a call.
Paul Larrabee, a spokesman for New York State
Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, said his office was "aware" of
the press reports regarding last week's operation, but was
"unaware" of any formal complaints filed regarding the
Yemenites.
"The Jewish Agency is just telling lies," said
Isaac Freund, a Satmar resident of Monroe, who said he had
helped the Nahari family settle in the United States. "We are
not holding their passports; the families are free to go
wherever they want," he said. "The Jewish Agency is the one
who has been intimidating the families not to come [to] or
stay in the United States and instead to go to
Israel."
Moshe Friedman, secretary to the Satmar grand
rabbi, Moses Teitelbaum, dismissed the Jewish Agency's
accusations as "ridiculous," according to the Westchester
Journal News.
Freund, who said he went several times to
Yemen and has actively supported the Yemenite immigrants, said
that Nahari and the children had in fact openly left for
Israel to visit her ailing mother and wanted to come back.
However, he said, Nahari was unable to return because she had
violated U.S. rules by leaving the country while she was in
the process of obtaining a green card. One Nahari family
member was quoted in the local Journal News supporting this
view.
Dalya Krinsky, an official with the New
York-based Yemenite Jewish Federation of America, rejected the
Satmar version of events. "Who are those people brainwashing
the Yemenis?" Krinsky asked. "This is corruption going on big
time, so why are Jewish organizations not acting? Do we need
the Jewish Agency and Israel to do this?"
Jewish Agency officials insist that
clandestine steps were needed to help the family leave Israel.
Landsberg said the agency's first attempt to bring the family
to Israel in December was thwarted by Satmar chasidim, who
took two of the younger children on a "play date" on the day
the family was supposed to leave. Freund denied such
claims.
This time, according to Landsberg, Nahari told
Satmar community members that she wanted to visit an ailing
parent in Israel. The five children left their house on the
morning of the departure date, dressed in their school
uniforms to avoid raising suspicion. They were then picked up
by a van, reunited with their mother at the Jewish Agency
office in New York, where their passports were waiting for
them with visas granted by the Israeli consulate. The family
then left to JFK airport to catch their flight to Tel Aviv,
where the media was waiting for them.
Upon arriving in Israel, Nahari, her three
daughters and two sons, ranging in age from 2 to 11, first
visited Nahari's mother in the city of Rehovot and then
settled into an immigrant absorption center in Ashkelon.
Fifteen members of the Nahari family remain in New
York.
Landsberg said they would receive special
funds set aside for Jews coming from countries of distress.
Asked whether the operation and the resulting Israeli media
attention would hamper efforts to bring more Yemenite Jews, he
said he was ready to continue helping them.
An official at the Israeli consulate in New
York would not confirm or deny that his office had granted
visas to the family. However, he added, Israel's Law of Return
allows the government to provide Jews who want to immigrate to
Israel with the necessary documentation.
In a side controversy to last week's episode,
the Israeli airline El Al drew intense criticism after its
representatives at JFK International Airport slapped the
Nahari family with a $250 fine for overweight luggage. Israeli
immigration officials involved in the operation condemned the
fine. One such official complained: "Is this how El Al,
Israel's national airline, welcomes the new immigrants who
arrive in the country?"
El Al, formerly a government-owned airline,
was privatized in 2003 as part of an economic reform plan
intended to bring the Israeli economy into conformance with
American norms. Warnings have been issued over the last year
that the privatization of the airline would reduce its
commitment to serving such noneconomic goals as airlifting
refugees and ensuring Israel's links to the world, but they
have mostly been dismissed by mainstream
economists.
Ha'aretz contributed to this
report.
© Forward - All
rights reserved.